Eustace Edward Ricardo Braithwaite (1912 to 2016), known as E. R. Braithwaite, was a Guyanese-born British-American novelist, writer, teacher and diplomat, best known for his stories of social conditions and racial discrimination against black people. He was the author of one of the famous 1959 autobiographical novels, ‘To Sir, with Love’.He also wrote ‘A Kind of Homecoming’, about his tour of Africa, ‘A Choice of Straws’, a novel set in London, and ‘Reluctant Neighbors’, a memoir and treatise about racism. Braithwaite’s numerous writings primarily deal with the difficulties of being an educated black man, a black social worker, a black teacher, and simply a human being who found himself in a set of inhumane circumstances.
‘To Sir, with Love’ is an autobiographical novel. The narrator is an engineer, but to make both ends meet, he accepts the job of a teacher in a rough London East End school. The school is full of troublemaker students who were rejected from other schools for their behaviour. At the beginning, the narrator is ridiculed and bullied by the students, but later his calm demeanor and desire to see them succeed gradually earn him their respect.
‘To Sir, with Love’ is a work of fiction based on the life of the author, E.R. Braithwaite. The main character, E. R. Braithwaite, works as an engineer in an oil refinery. He served in the Royal British Air Force in the war. After the war, being a black person, he was unable to find employment. As a last resort, he applied in a school to become a teacher. Surprisingly, he is accepted at the Greenslade School in London’s East End, and is set to teach the senior classes of the school.
While reading the novel, we have to understand that the time period in which the story takes place is very important. Braithwaite finds that even though he considers himself British and has served in the Royal Air Force (RAF), the English do not consider him to be one of them. This leads Braithwaite to feel bitter about the English and colonialism, as well as about his white students.
Braithwaite’s teaching position starts out roughly and is embarrassed time and again. He considers his students disrespectful (impolite), ill-mannered and mischievous (naughty) while his students consider him to be an arrogant (proudy) outsider, unfamiliar with the social environment in which they have grown up. The students harass him from day one, slamming their desks during his lecture, using foul (bad) language, and bullying (दादागिरी) him to a great extent. Even the girl students do not spare (leave) a moment to harass Braithwaite. In a reaction to that Braithwaite verbally scolds the girls for acting in an unladylike manner and being unruly (uncontrollable) in the class.
When he understands that his outburst (angry) has not gained him any respect and co- operation from the students, he changes his teaching and handling tactics (plans) and he decides to interact with them as though they are adults and respectable persons. He requires every girl be referred to as ‘Miss’ and that his students call him ‘Sir.’ At first, the students find this level of deference (respect) ridiculous (funny) and unnecessary; however, they come around after only a few weeks, completely changing both their hygiene and their attitudes towards one another. This marks the success of Braithwaite in handling the students in a very amicable way.
To increase the class cultural exposure (सांस्कृतिक प्रदर्शन), he takes them on field trips and excursions (trip) to museums and theatres, to everyone’s surprise many of the students have never been. A white female teacher, Gillian Blanchard, accompanies the class on these excursions; this marks the beginning of a friendship between Blanchard and Braithwaite. Similarly, Braithwaite’s relationship with his students is tested many a times.
Although his students frequently disappoint and hurt him, he learns to forgive them, the students constantly surprise him with their maturity, empathy (the ability to understand and share the feelings of another.) and knowledge. Another facet (angle) of the story which greatly affects its narrative lies is the heavy history of colonialism, its dark consequences (result), mental and physical trauma (damage) that increases Braithwaite’s hatred (hate) and wrath (anger) for British. He constantly feels the prejudicial (harmful) effects of colonialism while living in England after World War II, and these negative experiences frequently shape his thoughts and actions. Braithwaite is surprised and shocked by the conditions in which these students live, and also the physical trauma of the war that can be seen throughout his teaching environment.
1] Students-teacher relationship,
2] Prejudice (पक्षपात) and
3] Racism (जातिवाद) are the major themes of the novel.
Braithwaite gets a job of a teacher in a rather rough and notorious (infamous/कुविख्यात) school. He finds that the students belong to a background that is not suitable for learning and their overall development and progress. He notices that the students are in no mood to change their attitude and behaviour. Braithwaite with his novel (new) and creative ideas, innovative techniques and understanding the students’ psychology, ultimately wins their hearts in no time. (very soon)
Though he was bullied, harassed, mentally and physically tortured many times, he didn’t lose his patience and continued implementing his novel ideas and techniques that helped him to bring a significant change in his students’ lives. The racism prevalent (spread) in Great Britain during the mid-1940s, the time period during which ‘To Sir, with Love’ takes place, is of primary significance in the novel. The narrator cites (mentions) repeated incidents in which he experiences the racism of white Britons, including encounters on the bus, at job interviews, at Greenslade school, when searching for housing, at a restaurant with his girlfriend and so on.
At the outset, Braithwaite is struck by the unexpectedness of such prejudice. He was brought up in British Guiana and he viewed himself as a British citizen, not as a black British citizen in a British colony. When he served Great Britain in the Royal Air Force that gave him respect and esteem in the society. The day he left the job, he finds himself to be an outsider.
Braithwaite’s extensive (large) experience and education was of no use in job interviews, where he is informed that the job has already been filled or he is overqualified for it. This heightens (increase) Braithwaite’s sense of betrayal (treachery/ विश्वासघात) for the British. Interestingly, he never lashes (beat) out physically and only rarely does he do so verbally. He exhibits patient endurance at the times, and at others he describes the way the rage (anger) inside him is transforming into hatred so strong that he desires to hurt those who treat him unfairly. As a result of such experiences, Braithwaite finds the students at the Greenslade school to be a bit notorious and rough in behaviour but with proper care and treatment, all the students would surely achieve success and desired goals in their lives.
In this extract, Braithwaite recounts (narrate/describe) the half-yearly report of the Students’ Council, in which the students of the school report to the faculty and other students on what they have been studying thus far. Braithwaite’s class representatives speak knowledgeably (having a lot of knowledge) about their coursework and place a considerable amount of emphasis(stress) on how much they have learnt about different people, cultures, customs, and the importance of international and interracial (between different races/आंतरजातीय) cooperation.
Miss Joseph and Denham, both students of Braithwaite’s class, preside (lead/ conduct) over the meeting. At the outset (at the beginning), Mr. Florian, the headmaster, addresses the meeting with a lengthy (long), but well-received presentation. One after another, each class gives a brief report of their progress, through their chosen representatives, on what they have been studying in each subject so far. A panel of teachers is chosen for each class to answer any questions regarding the report submitted by the class. The lowest class begins first, and it is obvious that as the students’ progress through the ranks there is ‘a marked development in their ability to express themselves’. Mr. Braithwaite’s class, being the oldest, was the last to present their report.
Miss Joseph begins the highest class’s proceedings (taken action/ कार्यवाही) by clarifying that the common theme underlying all their studies this term is the interdependency (the depend on more people or things on each other.) of mankind.
1] Potter speaks in the field of math, focusing on how greater understanding in the world is fostered (raised) by the use of common weights and measures.
2] Miss Pegg and Jackson speak on geography, and
3] Miss Dare and Fernman discuss the subject of physiology, with Fernman stealing (without permission) the show by exhibiting a model of a human skeleton and stressing the class conclusion that “basically all people were the same.”
4] Miss Dodd reports on history, and
5] Miss Joseph on domestic science. (The study of cooking, needlework, and other subjects concerned with household skills.).
6] Denham creates a stir (make the people feel interest, excitement or shock) by speaking on the required subject of P.T. and games, complaining that the class ‘was ill-conceived and pointless.’(Useless)
Mr. Weston, Mrs. Dale-Evans, and Miss Phillips are chosen at random to answer students’ questions arising from the senior presentations.
When Denham pursues (continue) his inquiry on the necessity of requiring all students to take P.T., Mr. Weston responds quite ridiculously, trying to bluster (annoying) his way out of the subject, and offering no coherent (proper) argument. Unexpectedly, the quiet and hesitant (uncertain) Miss Phillips steps in and gives a sturdy (strongly) defense of the practice, and Denham, knowing that he has been outwitted (make a fool of ), has no choice but to respectfully cease (come to an end) his heated protest. Braithwaite is immensely satisfied with the progress of the students of his class.
Chapter – 17
The half-yearly report of the Students’ Council was on November 15th, and was one of the important days in the calendar of Greenslade School. I had heard quite a deal about these occasions and became as excited as the children as the day approached. It was entirely their day, arranged, presented and controlled by them. I observed the activities of my class as they prepared for it, noting with pride the business-like way in which tasks were allocated and fitted into a neat programme. There were whispered conferences with members of other classes in the arrangement of it. On that day there was no assembly. The children arrived smartly dressed and polished, and Miss Joseph and Denham, who seemed to be the important officials for the occasion, moved about among their colleagues ensuring that each one was ready to play his (her) part.
A bell was rung at 10.00 a.m. and everyone trooped (come or go together ) into the auditorium to sit together in classes. Miss Joseph and Denham, the two most senior students, sat on the stage, one on each side of Mr. Florian, who, as soon as everyone was seated and silent, stood and addressed the school. He spoke at length, reiterating (say something again) the aims and policy of the school and of the important contribution each child could make to the furtherance (achievement) of those aims. He gave praise wherever it was indicated, but insisted that there was yet a great deal to be done, by themselves, towards a general improvement in conduct (behaviour), cleanliness and the pursuit of knowledge. As I listened I realised that this man was in no way remote from his school; his remarks all showed that he identified himself with it and everyone in it. He then wished them success with the Council Meeting and left the stage to tremendous applause (praise expressed by clapping.).
Things now moved quickly into gear (adjust/ prepare) . First, Miss Joseph stood up, and gave a short explanation of the Council’s purpose and its activities. Each class would report, through its representatives, on the studies pursued during the half year which began after Easter (festival of christens), a representative having been chosen for each subject. When all the classes had completed their reports a panel of teachers would be invited to occupy (sit on) the stage and answer questions from the body of the hall on matters arising out of the various reports. The selection of the panel, as with everything else, was entirely at the discretion (choice) of the children and no members of the staff knew either how many or which teachers would be invited to sit. The reports began with the lowest or youngest class first. These were mainly twelve-year-olds who had joined the school the previous summer. Most of them were shy and rather frightened at standing up before the entire school, but nevertheless they managed it creditably (praise ably ) ; they had been newly introduced to the difficulties of seeking information for themselves, so their report was understandably rather short.
Class after class was represented, and it was obvious that with each succeeding (coming) term there was a marked development in their ability to express themselves. Much of the work was rather elementary (simple/easy), but to them it loomed (appear) large because they understood it and something of its relationship to themselves. Throughout all the reports, the emphasis (focus) was on what they understood rather than on what they were expected to learn. When the turn of my class came I sat up anxiously. From the list he held in his hand, Denham called out the names of the representatives, together with the subjects on which they would report.
Potter — Arithmetic (Math)
Sapiano — Nature Study
Miss Pegg and Jackson — Geography
Miss Dare and Fernman — Physiology (the branch of biology that deals with the normal functions of living organisms and their parts.)
Miss Dodd — History
Denham — P.T. and Games
Miss Joseph — Domestic Science
I felt terribly pleased and proud to see the confident courtesy with which Denham used the term ‘Miss’ in addressing each of the senior girls; I felt sure that this would in itself be something for the younger ones to aim at, a sort of badge (sign) of young adulthood (maturity). As their names were called they walked up to the stage and took their seats with commendable (admirable) gravity (Seriousness). Miss Joseph then gave a short address. She said that their lessons had a particular bias (against one person or group) towards the brotherhood of mankind, and that they had been learning through each subject how all mankind was interdependent in spite of geographical location and differences in colour, races and creeds. Then she called on Potter. Potter went on to speak of the work they had done on weights and measures; of the relationship between the kilogramme and the pound, the meter and the foot. He said that throughout the world one or other of those two methods was either in use or understood, and that it was a symbol of the greater understanding which was being accomplished (highly trained or skilled) between peoples. Sapiano spoke of the study the class had made of pests, especially black rot on wheat, boll weevil(small beetle) on cotton, and the Colorado beetle on potatoes. He showed how many countries had pooled (accumulate) their knowledge and results of research on the behaviour, breeding habits and migration of these pests, and were gradually reducing the threat they represented to these important products. Miss Pegg and Jackson divided the report on Geography between them. Jackson spoke first on the distribution of mineral deposits and vegetable produce over the earth’s surface, how a country rich in one was often deficient (not having enough) in the other; and of the interchange (exchange) and interdependence which inevitably followed. Miss Pegg dealt with human relationships, stressing the problems facing the post-war world for feeding, clothing and housing its populations. She also made a reference to the thousands of refugees, stateless and unwanted; and to the efforts and programmes of U.N.I.C.E.F. (the United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund) . Fernman as usual had a trump card (a valuable resource )up his sleeve. When called he made a signal to someone off-stage, and Welsh and Alison appeared bearing a skeleton between them, together with a sort of gallows. When this arrangement had been set up there was the skeleton hanging from a hook screwed into the top of its skull, gently revolving (moving in a circle) at the end of a cord (रस्सी). This was somewhat in the nature of comic relief (humorous), and the school showed its approval by laughing uproariously ( extremely noisy). But levity (humorousness) soon evaporated (ended) when Fernman began to speak; his voice was clear and precise (perfect/exact) and he had a strong sense of the dramatic. Calmly he told them that it was a female skeleton; that was a fact and could easily be proved. But he could not say with any assurance whether she had been Chinese or French or German or Greek; nor could he say if she had been brown or white or a mixture of both. And from that, he said, the class had concluded that basically all people were the same; the trimmings (decoration) might be different but the foundations were all laid out according to the same blue- print. Fernman was wonderful; he had them eating out of his hand (to be completely controlled by someone). Miss Dare’s contribution was something of an anti- climax (disappointing) after Fernman’s performance, and she seemed to realise it. She spoke about the problems which all humanity has to face in terms of sickness and disease, and of the advantages gained by interchange of knowledge, advice and assistance.
Miss Dodd reported on the period of History the class had studied – the Reformation (change/ development) in England. She told of the struggles of men of independent spirit against clerical domination and of their efforts to break from established religious traditions. From those early beginnings gradually grew the idea of tolerance (the capacity to endure) for the beliefs and cultures of others, and the now common interest in trying to study and understand those cultures. Denham’s report was a bit of a shock. He severely criticised the general pattern of P.T. and games, emphasizing the serious limitations of space (place) obtaining and the effect of that limitation on their games activities. He complained that the P.T. was ill-conceived and pointless, and the routine monotonous; he could see no advantage in doing it; a jolly good game was far better. Apparently he was voicing the opinions of all the boys, for they cheered him loudly. When the reports were over, Denham called two children at random from the audience and asked them to write the name of each teacher, including the Head on a slip of paper. These slips were folded and placed in a hat, juggled (continuously toss into the air and catch) vigorously (with an energy), and then withdrawn one by one. The names were called: Mr. Weston, Mrs. Dale-Evans, Miss Phillips. Denham and Miss Joseph led the others off the stage and the teachers took their seats, Weston big and bushily untidy between the two women.
Then the questioning began. I believe I would have gone a long way to see what followed; it was an experience which I shall not easily forget. The questions were mostly from the two top classes, probably because the young children were either too timid (afraid) or too uninformed (unable) to formulate (present) their questions. The teachers had no briefing (information/ preparation), and were often caught out stammering in their indecision (the inability to make a decision quickly). But here again, I received a big surprise. The frilly, seemingly brainless Miss Euphemia Phillips proved to be the coolest and best informed of the three. She dealt with questions put to her with candour (the quality of being open and honest; frankness) and authority, and would often intervene (take part in something so as to prevent or alter a result or course of events) skillfully to assist one of the others without causing embarrassment (discomfort).Weston cut (cross) a very ridiculous (funny/ हास्यास्पद) figure. In the face of Denham’s blunt (straightforward) criticisms (आलोचना) and Fernman’s adroit (clever or skilful.) questioning, he found himself completely nonplussed (confused) and tried to bluster (loud or aggressive talk /धमकाना) his way out with a show of offended (insulted) dignity (style). He could not effectively support the P.T. exercises, for which he was partly responsible (no relation), as having any definite physical advantage. Denham was a trained boxer, and insisted that such exercises were only advantageous if practiced daily and for more sustained periods; P.T. twice weekly for twenty minutes was a waste of time, he asserted (argued). Once again Miss Phillips took the reins (बाग-डोर) and her stock promptly shot up a hundredfold. She reminded the school that every subject, including P.T. and games, had been carefully considered and fitted into the teaching timetable so that each student received maximum benefit from it. The school with its limited facilities must be considered in terms of the greatest good for the greatest number, and it would be beyond anyone’s powers to please everybody. ‘Some of you,’ she concluded, fixing Denham with innocent eyes, ‘are fortunate in your own fine physical development and do not really need the few meager helpings (small help) of P.T. and games which this school can offer; try to remember that there are others for whom our programme is ideally suited. It may be that some of you older boys might even be able to help in that respect.’ Denham was not to be put off by these sugary remarks, and rose in reply. ‘Then why do we have to do P.T.? Why don’t they take only the kids who need it? The rest of us can have a game of football or something, ’stead of doing a lot of daft things that’s no good to us!’ This was a poser (confusing), but she came right back at him, her baby-blue eyes twinkling in her delight at this crossing of staves. ‘Let’s say it is as much an exercise of the mind as it is of the body, Denham. The whole timetable in this school is meant to help you in the world after you leave here, and doing what you are told in spite of not liking it, is part of the training. I feel sure that you will see the point in that.’ That stopped him. Poor Denham knew that he’d been outwitted but he could do nothing about it and sat looking rather rueful (expressing sorrow or regret), while Miss Phillips’ smile broadened; this frilly, innocent-looking puss (cat) had gobbled her canary without leaving the tiniest feather.
I began to understand how it was that so slight a creature could cope so effectively with her class. Soon after this, as the morning ended, the Head went on to the stage and closed the proceedings, expressing his pride in all the children and his deep appreciation of their efforts.
– E. R. Braithwaite
CHARACTER
(A1) (i) Which one among the following is a teacher in the extract? Select the correct one. Also cite a couple of lines from the extract in support of your answer.
(a) Denham
(b) Miss Joseph
(c) Sapiano
(d) Dale-Evans
Ans: Mrs. Dale-Evans is a teacher in the extract.
The following lines proves it.
1] The line , “Denham called two children at random from the audience and asked them to write the name of each teacher, including the Head on a slip of paper.” Shows that all the names on the slips were of the teachers.
2] The line , “The names were called: Mr. Weston, Mrs. Dale-Evans, Miss Phillips.” All the names were of the teachers
3] The line , “. Denham and Miss Joseph led the others off the stage and the teachers took their seats,” Denham and Miss Joseph came down from the stage means they are students.
4] The line , “Sapiano spoke of the study the class had made of pests” shows that Sapiano presenting her report means she is a student.
(ii) Complete the table highlighting the various traits (qualities / विशेषता) of the major characters in the extract
Ans:
| Traits |
Denham | Bold, clever, Respectful, Confident |
Miss Phillips | Calm, helpful, well- informed, clever, skillful |
Ferman | Funny, dramatic, Confident, persuasive |
Potter | Wise , intelligent , Knowledgeable, clear |
(iii) The narrator played a crucial (very important) role in bringing a significant change in the students. Explain the statement by citing some references from the extract.
Ans: When Braithwaite gets a job of a teacher for the senior class of Greenslade School, he encounters disrespectful, arrogant and ill-mannered students. But finally he changes the students by changing his approach in teaching. He starts to give respect to the students and they become good students. The half-yearly report presentation proves the perfect chance in the students.
1] The line. “It was entirely their day, arranged, presented and controlled by them” is an example of their will to take responsibility.
2] The line “The children arrived smartly dressed and polished.” This indicates that the students were aware of the importance of the event and took their roles seriously.
3] The line “ Miss Joseph and Denham moved about among their colleagues ensuring that each one was ready to play his (her) part” thus showing their ability to be good leaders.
4] The line “Denham used the term ‘Miss’ in addressing each of the senior girls’. It shows that Denham changed from an aggressive, rude student to a respectful young man.
5] The line, “The Head went on to the stage and closed the proceedings, expressing his pride in all the children and his deep appreciation of their efforts.” is a clear example of the positive influence Braithwaite has had on the students.
(iv) Fernman brought a comic relief in the Students’ Council programme. Explain.
Ans: A comic relief (humorous content/ मनोरंजन) is an element that creates humour in a serious situation. On the day of half-yearly report presentation, some students present serious and heavy topics so all become serious. But Fernman presents his report on Physiology, he signaled Welsh and Alison to carry a skeleton to the stage. The hanging skeleton was gently revolving which immediately made the audience laugh. Through his dramatic presentation, Fernman was able to relieve the tension of the audience by providing a comical element. Thus, he brought comic relief in the Students’ Council programme.
(v) Give a brief character-sketch of – Denham
Ans: Denham is one of the rude and disrespectful boys in Braithwaite’s class. But Braithwaite’s politeness and patience changed Denham into a responsible, respectful, mature, young man. This can be seen from his ability to host the Students’ Council and giving respect to the senior girls as ‘Miss’. He is a trained boxer. When he criticized the P.T and games, he receives the support from the other boys who cheer him from the audience. He confidently and respectfully question on the need for the P.T. class. to Miss Phillips.
Miss Joseph
Ans: Miss Joseph is one of the senior girls in Braithwaite’s class. A natural leader. Miss Joseph, along with Denham. is in charge of hosting the half-yearly report of the Students’ Council. Besides helping in the organization of the event, Miss Joseph assigned the other students. She also delivers a short address outlining the purpose of the Students’ Council activities. Miss Joseph also introduces her class’ theme of the brotherhood and delivers her report on Domestic Science. with the utmost ease.
The Narrator
Ans: The narrator of the novel is the author, E.R. Braithwaite, himself. The novel is based on his real-life experiences, which particularly focuses on his life in England and his job as a teacher at Greenslade School after the Second World War. Before becoming a teacher, he worked as an engineer and even served in the Royal British Air Force during the war. Though he is British, he is a victim of racial discrimination because he is a black man. Because of his race, he has trouble finding employment as a teacher at Greenslade School, London. The school is famous for its badly behaved students, but he changes them by taking extra effort to improve his teaching skills and makes successful students. He is the perfect example of a good teacher.
Miss Dare
Ans: Miss Pamela Dare is one of the senior girls in Braithwaite’s class. She presents a report on the subject of Physiology on the day of the half-yearly report with Fernman. Her report has no any such dramatic elements like Fernman, She outlines the problems of humanity of sickness and disease and states the benefits of exchanging knowledge. advice, and assistance among countries.
Miss Phillips
Ans: Miss Phillips, a teacher at Greenslade School, initially appears unintelligent but proves to be the best-informed among three panelists. Despite being unprepared, she answers questions honestly, assists other two teachers skillfully, and faces criticism of Denham and Fernman with clever arguments and a sweet language. Her impressive debate impresses the narrator.
Compare the following characters
1] Miss Joseph and Denham
Miss Joseph | Denham |
1. In-charge of the Students’ Council programme and through a short speech highlights the Council’s purpose and its activities 2. Representative of the subject of ‘Domestic Science’ 3. Speaks about the theme of the interdependence of mankind, which was at the root of all their lessons 4. Qualities: leadership skill, calm, | 1. In-charge of the Students’ Council programme and assigned the task of calling out the names of the student representatives of the senior class and using Miss to the senior girls displays courtesy. 2. Representative of the subject of ‘P.T. and games’ 3. Criticises the pattern of P.T. and games, citing the limitations of obtaining space, 4. Qualities: leadership skill, Blunt, courteous |
2] Fernman and Miss Dare
Fernman | Miss Dare |
1. Representative of the subject of ‘Physiology who brings comic relief by displaying a revolving skeleton, on the stage, hanging from a hook and who reports with a dramatic style 2. Speaks in a clear and precise(exact) manner and concludes, with the help of the skeleton, that all people are the same 3. Qualities : persuasive, confident. innovative,. clever | 1.Representative of the subject of ‘Physiology who presents after Fernman and whose report is plain, straightforward, but not having dramatic elements, thus making it anticlimactic 2. Speaks about the problems of sickness and disease faced by humanity and the benefits of exchanging knowledge. advice, and assistance 3.Qualities:,smart. unenergetic, passive |
3] Miss Phillips and Denham
Miss Phillips | Denham |
1. Tactfully answers all the questions asked by the students, specially Denham and even helps other teachers 2. Tackles the students’ questions with honesty, authority, skill and a calm and finally overcomes Denham with logic and presence of mind, impressing the students and the narrator 3. Demonstrates that teachers must respect the views of all students and clear their doubts with patience and logic 4. Qualities: calm, skillful, persuasive, well-informed, tough, logical, witty | 1. Without fear criticizes the P.T. and games, saying the limitations of obtaining space 2. Exhibits straightforwardness in his debate with Miss Phillips but feels sorry when he has lost the argument 3. Represents a student’s voice and demonstrates that students should fearlessly question to the teachers 4. Qualities: aggressive, blunt, assertive, logical, determined, smart |
4] Narrator and the Head of the school
Narrator | Head of the school |
1. Not actively participated and Seated in the audience. 2. Silently observes as the event from the audience.
3.Finally built a place for himself in school and in the minds of the students 4. Feels proud to see the transformation that his students have undergone 5. Qualities: observant, insightful, (sharp) pleased and surprised | 1. Actively participated and seated on the stage (at the beginning) and addressed the students 2.Expressed the aims and policies of the school, 3.He identifies himself with the school and everyone in it 4. Feels proud of all the students and expresses his appreciation of the efforts put in by them 5.Qualities: genuine, appreciative, understanding |
(ii) Describe in brief the purpose of organising the half-yearly report programme of Students’ Council.
Ans: The half-yearly report programme was an important event for the Students’ Council. In this report, the students would present what they studied, to the teachers and other students. The main purpose of the event was to discuss the academic progress of the students through which the teachers get a clear picture of the students’ understanding. Another significant aspect of the report was the panel discussion in which students can clear their doubts by asking the questions directly about the reports to a panel of teachers. This type of programme provides a platform to develop the organization skills and confidence among the students. Denham’s blunt criticism of the P.T. class is a perfect example of how such programmes can help the students to raise their voice.
(iii) Write in your words the entire half-yearly report programme of Students’ Council.
Ans: The half-yearly report programme was an important event for the Students’ Council which was held every year on November 15th. The representative of the each class report here what they or how much they have learnt.
Miss Joseph and Denham were important official of the students council. Both were representative of the narrator’s class, conducted over the meeting. The Head of the school, Florian addressed the meeting. After that one by one each class gave brief report of their progress. Mr. Weston, Mrs. Dale Evans and Miss Phillips were in a panel of teachers who were chosen to answer any questions out by the students.
The council began with the lowest class. The oldest class was the last. Miss Joseph presented the common theme of the term of the interdependency of mankind. Potter spoke about the Math. Miss. Pegg and Jackson spoke Geography. Miss Dare and Fernman presented the knowledge of Physiology. Fernman brought the human skeleton and proved that basically all people are the same. Miss. Dodd reported History and Miss Joseph, Domestic Science. Denham criticized the P.T. subject and Games.
Miss Phillips explained the importance of P.T. with coolly and honestly. Finally Denham accepted defeat and agreed with Miss Phillips. The narrator was very happy and satisfied to see the progress and the confidence of his students. The Head of the school, Florian ended the Programme.
(iv)Describe the question-answer session that took place at the end of the extract.
Ans: There was question answer session at the end of the report presentation of the students. Teachers had to answer the questions of the students. One of the most discussed question about P.T. subject raised. Miss Euphemia Phillips answered coolly and honestly rather than the two teachers. Fernman was skillful in asking questions. Denham was blunt, clever in his criticism. He criticized the P.T. and games in the school. He pointed that practicing P.T. and game twice weekly is wastage of time. Miss Phillips replied coolly that subject including P.T. and games had been considered carefully and fitted in the time table so that students got maximum benefit from it. Denham replied only for the kids it is useful and others who wanted to play football or any other game, it was useless. But Miss Phillips replied that the whole time table in the school helped them in the world after they left the school. The answer defeated Denham and he accepted also.
(v) Describe the discussion that took place between Miss Joseph and Denham.
Ans: There is no discussion that took place between Miss Joseph and Denham in the passage.
SETTING
(A3) (i) Which event took place in the extract? Choose the correct one. Give reason/s to support your answer.
(a) Annual Sports Day on November 15th
(d) Annual Social and Cultural Gathering on November 15th
(c) Half-yearly report of Students’ Council on November 15th
(d) Farewell Programme on November 15th
Ans: c) Half-yearly report of Students’ Council on November 15th
The lines to support this: “The half-yearly report of the students council was on November 15th and was one of the important days in the calendar of Greenslade School.”
(ii) The event in the extract was held at the _____. Choose the correct alternative. Give reason/s to support your answer.
(a) Author’s house
(b) Auditorium of the school
(c) Market
(d) Garden
Ans: (b) auditorium of the school.
The lines from extract to support: “A bell was rung at 10 am and every one trooped into the auditorium to sit together in classes.”
(iii) The incidents in the extract occurred at a particular place. Explain the significance of that place in your own words.
Ans: The incidents in the extract took place in the auditorium of Greenslade School. Since the major theme of the extract is student-teacher relationship, the school serves as the perfect setting. The students present their half-yearly reports and question the panel of teachers. Another aspect of the setting is the stage where they are taking active participation in their school. Finally, the stage also represents the perfect platform for the students to showcase their skills.
(iv) Explain how the setting of the extract contributes to the theme of the novel.
Ans: The teacher- students relationship is one of the most important theme of the novel. Racism is another theme. He describes here the school where the narrator felt difficult time with students. The students harassed him mentally. They were disrespectful and mischievous. The narrator tried to handle them peacefully with his novel techniques. He tolerated them and forgive. He used respectful words ‘Miss’ and ‘sir’. There was shocking change in the behaviour of the students. It was observed on the day of Students Council. They performed confidently and cleverly. Thus the setting rightly contributes to the theme of the novel.
THEME
(A4) (i) ‘When the turn of my class came I sat up anxiously’.
Why was the narrator anxious? Explain the statement by citing suitable references from the extract.
Ans: The students of his class were so disrespectful, ill mannered, and mischievous. The narrator felt so much difficulty to handle them. With his creative ideas and innovative techniques, he understood the mind set of the students. His efforts to improve the students became successful. There was development in the behaviour of the students. The students started giving him respect.
On the day of half yearly report of students council representative of all classes were participated. They were going to perform their subject knowledge. The narrator was now so anxious to know how his class students would perform. He wanted to know his teachings has been effective or not. How they would express themselves and how much they had understood during the period, he wanted to know. The most important the program was held open on the stage in presence of the Head and other teachers of the school. So the narrator’s anxiety grew more and sat up anxiously when the turn of his class came.
(11) Select two statements that describe the theme of the extract:
(a) Half-yearly report of the Students’ Council was not an important event for the students and teachers of school.
(b)The writer was immensely pleased to notice the progress of his students.
(c) The students showed a remarkable change in their behaviour and were progressing in all the subjects.
(d) The head of the institution was against conducting such activities in the school.
Answer:
(b) The writer was immensely pleased to notice the progress of his students.
(c) The students showed a remarkable change in their behavior and were progressing in all the subjects.
(iii) The relationship between the teacher and the students is highlighted in the extract. Illustrate with suitable examples from the extract.
Ans: When E.R. Braithwaite joined Greenslade School, in the beginning the relationship between teachers and the students is so critical. The students of the narrator’s class were disrespectful towards the teachers, narrator, E.R. Braithwaite. The narrator as a teacher was peaceful towards them. He tried to improve their behavior with using his novel techniques. He tolerated and forgave them on their every ill-mannered conduct. He talked them with respect using Mr. and Miss.
Denham and Miss Joseph conducted the whole programme on the day of the half yearly report of the Students’ Council. The representative of each class presented their reports confidently. At the end of the students’ presentation .The students asked questions clearly, confidently and critically because they were given full freedom of expression. They were fearless. The teachers were also frank with them. For example Miss. Phillips intervened skillfully and pleasantly. They satisfied their queries coolly and honestly. In short there was a fearlessness relationship between the teachers and the students.
(iv) Explain in brief the theme of the extract.
Ans: The central theme of the novel is the students – teachers relationship and the importance of the half-yearly report of the Students’ Council. The improvement in the conduct of the students, the increase in their level of confidence and courtesy is the theme of the extract. The free and frank relationship between teachers and students also central theme of the extract. Another important theme – Racial discrimination too plays a vital role in this novel.
(v) Describe the atmosphere of the school described in the extract.
Ans: The half-yearly report programme was an important event for the Students’ Council which was held every year on November 15th. Which decides the atmosphere of the school. We noticed here students freedom and fearlessness noticed. The programme was serious, frank and formal. The students honestly presented their report and asked questions fearlessly. The selected teachers also replied with frankly and confidently to satisfy the students. There was democratic set up. There was freedom of expression and honesty. The free and frank relationship between teachers and students show the positive and sporty atmosphere of the school.
LANGUAGE
(A4) (i) Explain the following statements that enrich the language and create a powerful impact.
a] Miss Phillips is transformed into a very convincing personality.
b] There are many features of language that contribute the smooth sailing of the plot.
(a) Miss Phillips is transformed into a very convincing personality.
Ans: Initially Miss. Phillips was considered as frilly and brainless. She was one of the three selected teachers in the panel to answer the questions of the students. When Denham asked about the P.T. and games subject are unnecessary for the students in the school. Other teachers were unable to answer only Miss. Philips replied coolly, honestly, cleverly and with responsibility. She told Denham about the important of the P.T. and games in the school. She told that the whole time table in the school was meant to help the students in the world after they left the school. It is part of training. Denham accepted and agreed with her answer. Thus the statement proves that who was considered brainless is transformed in to a very convincing personality at the end.
(b) There are many features of language that contribute the smooth sailing of the plot.
Ans: The words used by the narrator are very suitable for the plot. He used figurative language that create interest among the readers to read the whole novel. The language, expressions and sentences very useful to contribute the smooth sailing of the plot. For instance- frilly and brainless- Miss Phillips, sugary remarks, her baby blue eyes twinkling in delight at this crossing of staves. etc are the many words used by the narrator to give the reader complete idea of the situations.
(ii)Following are some dialogues of the major characters in the extract. Find out who the speaker is, his/her tone, the style, significance etc. of the dialogues.
Ans: The given statement is spoken by the student – Denham.
Denham was a boxer. While discussing with the teacher, his tone was clear, critical and argumentative initially. He felt P.T. is unnecessary for him and wastage of time. After discussion with Miss. Phillips, he accepted his defeat coolly.
Ans: Miss. Philips is the speaker of the given statement.
Her tone was cool. She honestly answers the questions coolly. She explained Denham and others, the important of the timetable with P.T. She was sure that Denham would agree with her explanation. This piece of advice was not meant only for Denham but also for the whole school and the reader as well.
Major Characters
-Ricky Braithwaite, (Narrator)
-Gillian Blanchard
-Mrs. Dale-Evans
-Denham
-Pamela Dare
-Mr. Florian
Minor Characters
-Bob Belmont
-Jess Belmont
-Jacqueline Bender
-Buckley
-Clinty
– Josy Dawes
-Selma Drew
-Patrick Fernman
-Hackman
-Tich Jackson
-Moira Joseph
-Monica Page
-Palmer
-Barbera Pegg
-Euphema Phillips
-Potter.
-Jane Purcell
-Sapiano
-Larence Seales
-Theo Watson
Students and their Subjects
Potter — Arithmetic (Math)
Sapiano — Nature Study
Miss Pegg and Jackson — Geography
Miss Dare and Fernman — Physiology (the branch of biology that deals with the
normal functions of living organisms and their parts.)
Miss Dodd — History
Denham — P.T. and Games
Miss Joseph — Domestic Science
Ans: Denham is one of the rude and disrespectful boys in Braithwaite’s class. But Braithwaite’s politeness and patience changed Denham into a responsible, respectful, mature, young man. This can be seen from his ability to host the Students’ Council and giving respect to the senior girls as ‘Miss’. He is a trained boxer. When he criticized the P.T and games, he receives the support from the other boys who cheer him from the audience. He confidently and respectfully questions on the need for the P.T. class. to Miss Phillips.
Ans: Miss Joseph is one of the senior girls in Braithwaite’s class. A natural leader. Miss Joseph, along with Denham. is in charge of hosting the half-yearly report of the Students’ Council. Besides helping in the organization of the event, Miss Joseph assigned the other students. She also delivers a short address outlining the purpose of the Students’ Council activities. Miss Joseph also introduces her class’ theme of the brotherhood and delivers her report on Domestic Science. with the utmost ease.
Ans: The narrator of the novel is the author, E.R. Braithwaite, himself. The novel is based on his real-life experiences, which particularly focuses on his life in England and his job as a teacher at Greenslade School after the Second World War. Before becoming a teacher, he worked as an engineer and even served in the Royal British Air Force during the war. Though he is British, he is a victim of racial discrimination because he is a black man. Because of his race, he has trouble finding employment as a teacher at Greenslade School, London. The school is famous for its badly behaved students, but he changes them by taking extra effort to improve his teaching skills and makes successful students. He is the perfect example of a good teacher.
Ans: Miss Pamela Dare is one of the senior girls in Braithwaite’s class. She presents a report on the subject of Physiology on the day of the half-yearly report with Fernman. Her report has no any such dramatic elements like Fernman, She outlines the problems of humanity of sickness and disease and states the benefits of exchanging knowledge. advice, and assistance among countries.
Ans: Miss Phillips is a teacher at Greenslade School and is one of three teachers to be chosen on the panel. The narrator describes her as an unintelligent woman. However, as the questioning begins, Miss Phillips proves that she is the best informed of the three. Despite being unprepared, she handles the questions with honesty She even helps the other teachers when she finds them struggling with the questions very skillfully. She answers carefully Denham and Fernman’s blunt criticisms with her clever arguments and sweet tone. Her debate with Denham impressed students and the narrator who finally admires Miss Phillips.
Maharashtra State Board of Secondary & Higher Secondary Education, Pune will declare the SSC result…
Maharashtra State Board of Secondary & Higher Secondary Education, Pune will declare the SSC result…
This is the test series timetable for the students of Arsod English Classes. there will…
SSC and HSC Maharashtra Board examination Timetable - for the year 2026
The first novel History of Novel tells us the history of novels from the beginning